Comments on: UK is ‘least effective’ G7 country at protecting nature http://www.birdsontheedge.org/2021/05/19/uk-is-least-effective-g7-country-at-protecting-nature/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=uk-is-least-effective-g7-country-at-protecting-nature Saving coastal birds and habitats from extinction Fri, 07 Jul 2023 06:34:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3.17 By: Miranda Collett http://www.birdsontheedge.org/2021/05/19/uk-is-least-effective-g7-country-at-protecting-nature/#comment-9056 Sun, 23 May 2021 16:43:38 +0000 http://www.birdsontheedge.org/?p=45055#comment-9056 Maybe it is time to face the fact that the UK has to try to reduce its population. There are far too many humans living in a small island.Encouragement should be given for smaller families. Humans are not in danger of extinction, although this may change if we continue to decimate all other species.Nearly all other species are in danger.

]]> By: Norman Seal http://www.birdsontheedge.org/2021/05/19/uk-is-least-effective-g7-country-at-protecting-nature/#comment-9050 Thu, 20 May 2021 08:21:14 +0000 http://www.birdsontheedge.org/?p=45055#comment-9050 How can this be fair to compare the UK with Germany, France and especially Canada when we have a higher population density per km/2 ?!

We (UK) have a pop. density of 272/km2 ( England is actually 424/km/2 ) whereas Germany has 232, France 118 and Canada has only 3.78 – yes less than 4 people / km/2 !!!

With more people per square kilometre and a growing population on a small island, we will always have less space for nature.

]]>